Comments on: Notice: SVN Path Change

By: Drognan

Drognan — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 16:36:33 +0000

BLKMGK, I did

svn switch http://xbmc.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/xbmc/trunk/ ./XBMC

and it worked, I took out the s in https and it worked.

By: CHASE

CHASE — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 04:25:47 +0000

BLKMGK just throw a PATH onto the end of your command.

svn co https://xbmc.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/xbmc/trunk/ ./XBMC

for more info take a look at “svn help co”

By: BLKMGK

BLKMGK — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 21:03:09 +0000

Okay, I tried this in my old XBMC directory and receive an error->

blkmgk@XBMC-ION:~/XBMC$ svn switch https://xbmc.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/xbmc/trunk
svn: ‘http://xbmc.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/xbmc/branches/linuxport/XBMC’
is not the same repository as
‘https://xbmc.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/xbmc’

The old how-to page says to use -> svn checkout {{svn}}
And the Ubuntu page says -> svn co https://xbmc.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/xbmc/trunk/

The first isn’t valid and the latter appears to drop a new copy of code in a brand new directory called trunk. Umm, I’d like to keep using the old XBMC directory – is this not possible and if so was the command above supposed to do that for me? How best to do this?

By: benny_fretzak

benny_fretzak — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 05:27:18 +0000

benny_fretzak :
Could it be that the gentoo xbmc-9999 ebuild is not adjusted yet?

sorry, just saw this. The gentoo people are on it:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=286052

By: benny_fretzak

benny_fretzak — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 05:26:20 +0000

Could it be that the gentoo xbmc-9999 ebuild is not adjusted yet?

By: terminal.illness

terminal.illness — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:22:26 +0000

Thanks theuni

By: Dan Dar3

Dan Dar3 — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:40:02 +0000

Updated XBMC Xbox wiki page to reflect branch change.

http://www.xbmc.org/wiki/?title=HOW-TO_compile_XBMC_for_Xbox_from_source_code

By: theuni

theuni — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:22:13 +0000

@terminal.illness Things are shaping up but still under heavy reorganization. We'll be sure to let you know when we think it's stabilized.

By: terminal.illness

terminal.illness — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:18:03 +0000

Does this mark the start of a now stable SVN? Or will that be a separate announcement?

By: theuni

theuni — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 03:47:59 +0000

@kricker Looks like you're correct, post updated. Thanks.