waldo22
2008-04-18, 23:09
This topic really doesn't fit anywhere, but the MythTV integration thread is in here, so I thought it might as well go here.
I have a dilemma...
1) I'm going to build an XBMC Linux PC for my front end.
2) I currently have a huge 12.5 TB RAID6 array running on plain old Windows XP machine in my office.
3) I'm going to add an r5000 HD satellite tuner box that will interface with my MythTV backend. http://www.nextcomwireless.com/R5000/home.htm
(this allows unmolested recording of .ts streams, both HD and SD, from satellite via a USB 2.0 connection installed in the STB)
Right now, this genius-guy named alannisota (the same guy who developed the CoreAVC patch for Linux (http://code.google.com/p/coreavc-for-linux/)) has integrated support for using this r5000 upgrade as a TV Tuner into MythTV (http://svn.mythtv.org/trac/ticket/4752).
So the dilemma is,
-Do I install the MythTV backend on the same Linux box that I run the XBMC Linux frontend on, plug the sat box directly into it, but have it save the .ts streams across the network onto my 12TB Windows "NAS"? I'm worried about network bandwidth/reliability for pausing/rewinding Live TV at HD resolutions, even if I use GB Ethernet. (this would presumably require two streams, one saving the stream to the NAS, and another to watch it off of the NAS, which seems inefficient)
-or-
-Do I wait until they finish the MythTV backend port for Windows (which may be a long time, as only the frontend has been started), install it directly on my Windows "NAS" and plug the satellite STB into it, thus saving the streams directly onto the NAS and just streaming the content across the network when viewing?
-or-
Will someone please give me a brilliant and much more desirable solution? :o
The STB plugs in via USB to save the .ts streams, and is also controlled that way.
The ideal solution would be to plug the STB directly into the "NAS" and still have the MythTV Backend on my XBMC machine, which could see it as a tuner and control it from across the network, but as far as I know, that functionality doesn't currently exist, and I don't know if it's feasible.
Whaddyouthink?
-Wes
I have a dilemma...
1) I'm going to build an XBMC Linux PC for my front end.
2) I currently have a huge 12.5 TB RAID6 array running on plain old Windows XP machine in my office.
3) I'm going to add an r5000 HD satellite tuner box that will interface with my MythTV backend. http://www.nextcomwireless.com/R5000/home.htm
(this allows unmolested recording of .ts streams, both HD and SD, from satellite via a USB 2.0 connection installed in the STB)
Right now, this genius-guy named alannisota (the same guy who developed the CoreAVC patch for Linux (http://code.google.com/p/coreavc-for-linux/)) has integrated support for using this r5000 upgrade as a TV Tuner into MythTV (http://svn.mythtv.org/trac/ticket/4752).
So the dilemma is,
-Do I install the MythTV backend on the same Linux box that I run the XBMC Linux frontend on, plug the sat box directly into it, but have it save the .ts streams across the network onto my 12TB Windows "NAS"? I'm worried about network bandwidth/reliability for pausing/rewinding Live TV at HD resolutions, even if I use GB Ethernet. (this would presumably require two streams, one saving the stream to the NAS, and another to watch it off of the NAS, which seems inefficient)
-or-
-Do I wait until they finish the MythTV backend port for Windows (which may be a long time, as only the frontend has been started), install it directly on my Windows "NAS" and plug the satellite STB into it, thus saving the streams directly onto the NAS and just streaming the content across the network when viewing?
-or-
Will someone please give me a brilliant and much more desirable solution? :o
The STB plugs in via USB to save the .ts streams, and is also controlled that way.
The ideal solution would be to plug the STB directly into the "NAS" and still have the MythTV Backend on my XBMC machine, which could see it as a tuner and control it from across the network, but as far as I know, that functionality doesn't currently exist, and I don't know if it's feasible.
Whaddyouthink?
-Wes